Journal of Advanced Cytology - Reviewer Register

We welcome reviewers with expertise in cytology, diagnostics, and cellular biology.

• Current affiliation and contact details
• Areas of expertise and methodological skills
• Recent publications or clinical experience
• Availability and preferred review load

Reviewers are expected to provide constructive, unbiased assessments and disclose conflicts of interest.

• Cytopathology diagnostics
• Digital pathology and imaging analytics
• Molecular cytology and biomarkers
• Quality assurance and laboratory workflows

Reviewers must treat manuscripts as confidential and disclose conflicts before accepting assignments.

Reviewer activity can be documented for institutional service records and professional development files.

Indicate preferred review load and periods of limited availability to support balanced assignments.

Reviewers should follow confidentiality requirements and report any conflicts immediately.

Accurate profiles help distribute workload fairly and improve match quality for assignments.

Complete profiles help the editorial office assign manuscripts quickly and fairly.

Clear expertise descriptions improve reviewer matching and reduce delays.

• List primary cytology specialties
• Include methodological strengths
• Provide recent publication examples
• Confirm availability windows

Service acknowledgements are available for institutional documentation and professional records.

Recognition supports career development in research and clinical practice.

Documented service can support promotion and appraisal requirements.

Recognition helps demonstrate professional contribution to the field.

Service records can support institutional review processes.

Recognition encourages continued participation.

Continued participation supports timely review cycles.

Profiles should be updated regularly.

Regular updates improve match accuracy.

Accurate matches reduce review delays.

Reduced delays improve author experience.

Positive experiences improve participation.

Participation strengthens the reviewer pool.

A strong pool supports review capacity.

Clear availability information helps the editorial team assign reviews fairly across the year.

Reviewers can update availability at any time to reflect clinical or research commitments.

• State preferred number of reviews per year
• List months with limited availability
• Update expertise keywords as needed
• Confirm willingness for urgent reviews

Recognition supports career development and service reporting.