Reviewer Register
Join the reviewer community for cervical cancer research.
Reviewer Registration
Contribute your expertise to rigorous peer review.
Publishing Standards
Open Access Reach
All articles are immediately available worldwide, supporting clinicians, researchers, and public health teams.
Rigorous Review
Single blind peer review with editorial oversight ensures methodological and ethical integrity.
DOI and Metadata
Structured metadata and DOI registration improve discoverability across scholarly platforms.
Ethics First
We prioritize patient consent, data transparency, and adherence to international research guidelines.
Who Should Apply
Reviewers should have expertise in gynecologic oncology, pathology, epidemiology, public health, or related fields with cervical cancer relevance.
Expertise Areas
Provide subject keywords, methodological strengths, and clinical focus areas to help match manuscripts effectively.
How to Register
Send a brief CV and expertise summary to the editorial office. Approved reviewers receive onboarding guidance and review expectations.
Recognition
Reviewers receive acknowledgment for contributions and may be considered for editorial roles.
Additional Context
Reviewers are selected based on expertise in gynecologic oncology, pathology, virology, epidemiology, or public health with cervical cancer relevance.
Provide a concise summary of methodological strengths, preferred topics, and recent publications to assist with manuscript matching.
Approved reviewers receive orientation materials and guidance on timelines, ethics, and confidentiality expectations.
Regular reviewers may be considered for editorial roles based on performance and engagement.
Cervical cancer research benefits from clear reporting of population characteristics, including age distribution, screening history, and vaccination status. This context helps readers interpret generalizability and informs policy decisions.
When describing interventions, explain how they align with clinical guidelines or public health recommendations. Contextualizing findings supports translation into care pathways.
Transparent reporting of funding sources and resource constraints helps readers assess feasibility in different settings. This is critical for global health adoption.
Where possible, include discussion of equity impacts and strategies to reduce disparities in screening or treatment access.
High quality visual summaries and clear tables improve uptake by clinicians and program managers. Provide succinct interpretations for key outputs.
Consider including patient engagement or community involvement approaches when they inform program design or trial recruitment.
Explain how results compare with prior evidence and identify remaining knowledge gaps for future cervical cancer research.
JCC Commitment
Journal of Cervical Cancer is dedicated to advancing cervical cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment through transparent publishing.
Our editorial office supports authors, reviewers, and readers with clear guidance and responsive communication. Contact [email protected] for scope or workflow questions.
Register as a Reviewer
Support evidence based cervical cancer research.