Journal of Skin Cancer Epidemiology

Journal of Skin Cancer Epidemiology

Journal of Skin Cancer Epidemiology – Reviewer Guidelines

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript
REVIEWERS

Reviewer Guidelines

Guidance for reviewers evaluating skin cancer epidemiology manuscripts with rigor and fairness.

Research Metrics 2025
Melanoma
BCC
SCC
Rigor First
Clear Feedback
Timely Review
01

Evidence Focus

Evaluate study design, exposure measurement, and statistical rigor.

02

Constructive Tone

Provide actionable feedback that helps authors improve clarity and methodology.

03

Timeliness

Accept reviews only when you can meet deadlines.

04

Ethics Checks

Confirm IRB approvals, consent statements, and conflict disclosures.

05

Data Transparency

Encourage data availability statements and repository use.

06

Public Health Impact

Assess how findings inform prevention or policy decisions.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for public health translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for public health translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for public health translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for public health translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for public health translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for public health translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for public health translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for public health translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for public health translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for public health translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Reviewer Impact

Constructive reviews strengthen manuscripts and improve evidence quality for public health translation.

Timely Feedback

Accept reviews when timelines are feasible and communicate delays early.

Join The Reviewer Pool

Email [email protected] if you are interested in reviewing for JSCE. Your service helps strengthen prevention evidence and policy impact.