Reviewer Resources
Guiding principles for ethical and effective peer evaluation.
Contributing as a reviewer for Journal of Hematology and Oncology Research (JHOR) involves maintaining the highest standards of scientific and ethical conduct. These resources assist both new and seasoned reviewers in performing high-impact assessments.
Ethical Obligations for Reviewers
- Objective Assessment: Evaluate manuscripts based solely on their individual merit, without bias toward the author’s background or affiliation.
- Timely Review: Aim for prompt evaluations to minimize the publication timeline for critical clinical research.
- Confidentiality: Do not share any details of the manuscript under review with external parties.
- Respect for Autonomy: Prioritize the author's intellectual autonomy throughout the review process.
- Conflict Declaration: Recuse yourself if a manuscript is closely related to your current research or if a conflict of interest exists.
Handling Submissions
Security: It is recommended to use PDF formats when handling manuscripts to ensure content
remains unchanged. Avoid making direct comments on Word versions unless requested.
Quick Support
Upholding clinical truth through collective expertise. Last updated: January 2026.
