Editorial PoliciesJournal of Ulcers
Clear policies protect the quality of ulcer research.
Editorial Independence
Decisions are based on scientific merit, clinical relevance, and ethical compliance. Financial considerations do not influence editorial outcomes.
Peer Review Standards
JU uses independent expert review to evaluate methodology, reporting quality, and clinical impact.
Ethics and Research Integrity
All submissions are screened for plagiarism and ethical compliance. Concerns about misconduct are handled with documented procedures.
Conflicts and Transparency
Authors, editors, and reviewers must disclose potential conflicts of interest. Transparency protects clinical trust in published findings.
Corrections and Retractions
If errors are identified after publication, JU issues corrections or retractions as needed to preserve the scholarly record.
Publish With Integrity
Submit your manuscript with confidence in our editorial standards.
Submit via ManuscriptZoneSimple SubmissionEmail: [email protected]
Clinical Reach
JU content is written for clinicians and researchers who apply ulcer evidence in practice, supporting better patient outcomes and care pathways.
Author Support
The editorial office provides clear guidance at each stage so authors can move from submission to publication with confidence.
Integrity and Trust
Our policies prioritize ethical compliance, transparency, and rigorous review to protect the credibility of ulcer research.
Appeals and Complaints
Authors may appeal decisions with a reasoned response and supporting evidence. Complaints are reviewed transparently by the editorial office.
Data Verification
Editors may request data or documentation to resolve questions about reliability or reproducibility.
Authorship Accountability
All listed authors must meet accepted authorship criteria and confirm responsibility for the integrity of the work. Contributions should be clearly described to ensure transparency and prevent disputes.
Ethics Approval
Studies involving human participants or animals must include ethics committee approval and consent details where applicable. Submissions lacking clear ethical oversight may be returned before review.
Clinical Trial Registration
Prospective clinical trials should be registered in a recognized registry. Registration details should appear in the manuscript so readers can verify protocols and outcomes.
Data Availability
Authors should include a data availability statement that explains how supporting data can be accessed or why restrictions apply. Transparent data practices strengthen the reproducibility of ulcer research.
Image and Text Screening
Submissions are screened for originality and image integrity to protect the reliability of the record. Any concerns are handled according to documented investigation procedures.
Reviewer Conduct
Reviewers are expected to provide constructive feedback, respect confidentiality, and disclose conflicts of interest. The editorial office monitors adherence to these standards.
Post Publication Updates
If new evidence or concerns arise after publication, JU follows clear procedures for issuing corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions when necessary.
Peer Review Model
JU uses independent expert review with clear guidance on methodology, reporting, and clinical impact. Editors ensure reviews are balanced, respectful, and focused on improving the manuscript.
Reporting Standards
Authors are encouraged to follow recognized reporting frameworks such as CONSORT, STROBE, and PRISMA when appropriate. Structured reporting improves reproducibility and makes clinical findings easier to interpret.
Allegations and Investigations
Concerns raised by readers, reviewers, or institutions are assessed promptly. The editorial office follows documented procedures and communicates outcomes clearly to protect the integrity of the record.
Editorial Oversight
The editorial board reviews policy updates and workflow performance to maintain consistent standards. Ongoing oversight helps ensure that decisions align with ethical and clinical expectations consistently.
Confidentiality and Privacy
Submitted manuscripts and reviewer reports are treated as confidential documents. Personal data is handled according to privacy requirements and used only for editorial processes.
Editorial Independence
Editors retain full independence in decision making and are not influenced by commercial considerations. This preserves trust and ensures clinical relevance remains the primary criterion.
Decision Communication
Decision letters summarize key review points and provide clear guidance on required revisions. Transparent communication helps authors respond effectively and supports a fair, consistent editorial process. Clear timelines help authors plan resubmissions and maintain clinical relevance.
Research Transparency
We encourage clear disclosure of funding, protocol deviations, and limitations. Transparent reporting helps clinicians interpret ulcer evidence responsibly and improves trust in published conclusions. This includes noting industry involvement or protocol changes and explaining how supporting data can be reviewed when feasible.
